[PLUG] Firmware, tainted code etc [was Re: [X-Post] [ilugd] linux-libre kernel. fork?]
sundaram at fedoraproject.org
Wed May 28 22:34:13 PDT 2008
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Rahul Sundaram
> < wrote:
>> ഓം wrote:
>>> Whosoever calls for *clear separation* (i think) has a burden upon
>>> self to define what is *clear* and what is *separation* and also what
>>> is *clear separation* as it applies to the work giving enough
>>> examples on both the sides...
>> I am not calling for "clear separation". I am merely explaining to you the
>> implication of the license. For further details, you should actually read
>> the license itself especially the sections regarding derived work and
>> relevant copyright laws.
> I think you are refering to copyleft laws while arguing...
There is no such thing as "copyleft" laws. So no, I am not referring to
anything like that.
More information about the plug-mail