[PLUG] Canonical Not A Great Contributor
kunalt at gmail.com
Sun Sep 28 05:06:07 PDT 2008
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Swapnil Bhartiya <
swapnil.bhartiya at gmail.com> wrote:
> I just learnt from a friend of mine that I should stop using Ubuntu as
> Canonical is not contribiting to the developmemt of GNU/Linux systems as
> compared to other players. He also suggested that since most of its stuff,
> or nothing, is upstream so we cant trust it. Also his argument was, being
> run by one man, who may tomorrow change his mind and stop support to
> then what?
> So, I am bringing this issue to the lista and have people's opinion as to
> how much Canonical has contributed and how wise is the decision to use
> Here is the article of Greg Kroah-Hartman, maintainer of the USB and other
> subsystems in the Linux kernel mentioning Canonical contribution to be 100
> patches viz a viz 230 by Mandriva and only 270 by Gentoo. Remember Ubuntu
> quite young compared to Mandriva, Gentoo.
> Please suggest.
> Swapnil Bhartiya
> Mobile: 09910956518
> I use Free Software, what do you use?
> Pune GNU/Linux Users Group Mailing List: (plug-mail at plug.org.in)
> List Information: http://plug.org.in/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/plug-mail
> Send 'help' to plug-mail-request at plug.org.in for mailing instructions.
IMHO Ubuntu does more than any other distro out there in popularizing Linux
as an Operating System and hence is contributing a lot more to open source.
I don't see how developing on upstream projects will make it more robust or
stable or better to use.
As regards to the fact that Ubuntu has a BDFL in Shuttleworth, I think thats
a boon more than a curse. If at any point in the future the community
becomes disillusioned by his decisions, there is always the option of a
fork. Going by his past record, it seems unlikely that there would be a fork
in the near future.
More information about the plug-mail