[PLUG] Firmware, tainted code etc [was Re: [X-Post] [ilugd] linux-libre kernel. fork?]

BVK bvk.groups at gmail.com
Fri May 30 11:56:18 IST 2008

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 9:34 AM, ഓം <guru.is.on.vi at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:17 PM, BVK <bvk.groups at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:17 PM, ഓം <guru.is.on.vi at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> ... just like I would call
>>> someone arguing on behalf of FSF as charged follower..
>> As a 3rd party, i can see that they were talking about the license
>> terms till now, its you who is brought this *on behalf of FSF*
>> storyline into the picture.  Do you really need to hate FSF that much?
> So let them argue to their hearts content.  Thanks for point out that
> I need not contribute...

OMG.  What statement of my above paragraph really meant that, you need
not contribute?

>>>> but I thought
>>>> electrons need a *potential difference* to flow. They never cross the
>>>> higher potential as far as I remember, they flow from a higher
>>>> potential to a lower potential.
>>> everything is relatively easy to disprove...
>> This is an assertion, please disprove!
> No need for me... you yourself can try to test it taking into account
> any specific work... (including this one)

So basically, what you mean here is:

1. You can argue that some stuff XYZ is relatively easy.
2. When somebody asks how, you don't need to tell.

Now i understand you (and why you call yourself a Guru).


More information about the Plug-mail mailing list