shirishag75 at gmail.com
Wed Feb 11 02:32:58 IST 2009
Reply in-line :-
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:53, Sudhanwa Jogalekar
<sudhanwa.com at gmail.com> wrote:
> There is nothing in that post about SK's session.
I just see/saw the following on the site
1 i-want-2-do-project. tell-me-wat-2-do Shakthi Kannan
Now I read something into it. It could be or not be what I thought it was.
How am I suppose to read it any other way unless there is a link which
give a more broader description of what he's going to be talking
> These kind of mails look like self promotion/blog promotion. Actually,
> these kind of mails are giving you a negative publicity. I am moving
> away from your further posts.
Its your prerogative.
> For a good, positive reporting/contribution/blog, do not use posting
> by somebody else in a wrong context, use your own work.
The point is how does one know what is right or wrong context if the
context is not fully given.
> ps: cut off that cc license crap for the email signature. It does not
> serve any purpose.
For me it serves. I don't send just e-mail to lists but also to people
and for work.
Perhaps you should take a look at
Also similar stuff could be said for having domain names for signatures.
>> Comments, suggestions as always welcome.
My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17
More information about the Plug-mail